Legal Opinion

Greengo v. Public Employees Mut. Ins. Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1998No. 64218-4PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

959 P.2d 657 (1998)

135 Wash.2d 799

Laurie GREENGO, Petitioner,

v.

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 64218-4.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued February 25, 1997.

Decided July 23, 1998.

Alexander Higgins, John Budlong, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Burgess, Fitzer, Leighton & Phillips, Timothy Gosselin, Tacoma, for Respondent.

SANDERS, Justice.

Two questions are posed: first, whether an underinsured motorist (UIM) anti-stacking clause in an insurance policy is valid where it limits an insured's UIM recovery to one recovery per accident from whatever source; and second,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Donegal Mutual Insurance v. BaumhammersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. State v. AhoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. AhoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Mader v. Health Care AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. TrippWashington Supreme Court · 2001

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API