Legal Opinion
Federated American Insurance v. Raynes
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1977No. 44585PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
This appeal concerns the validity of certain provisions in the uninsured motorist section of an insurance policy which appellant, Federated American Insurance Company (FAI), had issued to David Raynes, respondent.
Respondent was injured in an accident while driving his motorcycle. For the purposes of this action, the parties stipulated that the driver of the car which struck respondent was at fault and was an uninsured motorist. The driver of the car is not a party in this suit. FAI is not the insurer of the motorcycle. Respondent insured his motorcycle through another insurance company which…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Squire v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Finney v. Farmers Insurance Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.