Legal Opinion

Cherry v. Truck Insurance Exchange

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 20, 1995No. 15714-4-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.

Allen K. Cherry, an emergency service tow truck operator, was injured on a service call while helping an uninsured, stranded motorist. Cherry 1 filed a lawsuit against the insurer of the emergency service tow truck, Truck Insurance Exchange (Exchange), seeking coverage under the underinsured motorist (UIM) provisions of the policy. On cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court concluded that Cherry was not "using” the tow truck at the time of his injury, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion. This court previously issued an unpublished…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Roller v. Stonewall InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Dawes v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Rau v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Butzberger v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Mid-Century Insurance v. HenaultWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Beckman v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. Amberleigh HUDSON v. GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., D/B/A GEICO General Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017
  5. Culp v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API