Legal Opinion

Wendle v. Farrow

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1984No. 50452-1PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

This case is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing an action for contribution. The trial court held that the action was barred by the parental immunity doctrine and by RCW 4.22.060(2). We affirm, but on a different ground; this action is barred by the doctrine of equitable estoppel.

On July 27, 1981, Gloria Farrow and her 21/2-year-old son, Michael, went to the residence of Mr. and Mrs. Jan Wendle to pick berries, at the invitation of the Wendies. After picking berries for a few minutes, Gloria noticed that her son had disappeared, and started looking for him. Michael was found,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gross v. City of LynnwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Zehring v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Johnson v. Central Valley School District No. 356Washington Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Roller v. Stonewall InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Babcock v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Dunlap v. WayneWashington Supreme Court · 1986

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API