Rq Squared, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Implied-in-Fact Contract Claim; RCFC 12(c); RCFC 56(d).
OPINION
BUSH, Senior Judge.
The court has before it defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, relying on Rule 12(c) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), as well as, in the alternative, defendant’s motion for summary judgment, relying on RCFC 56. These motions have been fully briefed. Oral argument was neither requested by the parties nor deemed necessary by the court. For the reasons described below, defendant’s RCFC 12(c) motion is granted in part and denied in part, and defendant’s RCFC 56 motion is…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rq Squared, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Stathis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.