Legal Opinion

Allen v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 22, 2015No. 12-42C; 12-4208C; 12-4209C; 12-4210C; 12-4211C; 12-4212C; 12-4213C; 12-4214C; 12-4215C; 12-4216C; 12-4217C; 12-4218CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se Plaintiffs; Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; Breach of Contract; Contract Interpretation.

OPINION

HORN, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Plaintiffs are twelve current or former employees of the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Forest Service), employed in the Los Padres National Forest in California, who filed a complaint to recover $2,500,000.00 in damages. 1 According to plaintiffs, the damages were caused by the January 15,2008 Los Padres National Forest Quarters Policy announced by the Los Padres National Forest Unit of the Forest Service. Plaintiffs claim that the…

2Cases cited159 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mlb Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  2. Nstar Electric Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  3. Vectrus Services A/S v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API