Legal Opinion
James v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 28, 2017No. 14-6L, 14-38LPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment; Takings Claim; Trails Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1241 et seq. (2012); S.C. Code § 57-3-220(A).
OPINION
HORN, J.
FINDINGS OF FACT
In these consolidated rails-to-trails cases, plaintiffs are landowners in South Carolina who allege that they are entitled to receive just compensation under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution because the United States government effected takings of their reversionary property interests by operation of the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1241 et seq. (2012) (the Trails Act). Plaintiffs own property adjacent to…
2Cases cited179 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Balagna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Banks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Cheshire Hunt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.