Legal Opinion

Rq Squared, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 3, 2017No. 12-527 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Implied-in-Fact Contract Claim; Second RCFC 56(d) Request; Mere Speculation as to the Existence of Additional Undiscovered Relevant Facts; No Genuine Issues of Material Fact.

OPINION AND ORDER

BUSH, Senior Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s renewed motion for summary judgment, relying on Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The motion has been fully briefed, and oral argument, upon plaintiffs request, was held on November 3, 2016. Although plaintiff again asks that the court deny the government summary judgment on the claims set forth in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. J.F. Feeser, Inc. v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  2. Bes design/build, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  3. Cheung v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  4. Flying S. Land Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Lucier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API