Legal Opinion

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 20, 2015No. 12-898CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Second litigation over a contractor’s compliance with Cost Accounting Standards pertinent to indirect materiel overhead costs; government’s “alternative” claim, to that litigated to final judgment in the prior action; applicability of the doctrine of claim preclusion

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

This action concerns the accounting practices of plaintiff, Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (“Sikorsky”), a government contractor, and is a reprise of a prior dispute between Sikorsky and the United States (“the government”) over those practices. At this juncture, the question before the court is…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sunoco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Ameriserv Trust & Financial Services Co. Ex Rel. Employee Real Estate Construction Trust Fund v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Sonoma Apartment Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. Arensmeyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  5. Digiflight, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API