Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Second litigation over a contractor’s compliance with Cost Accounting Standards pertinent to indirect materiel overhead costs; government’s “alternative” claim, to that litigated to final judgment in the prior action; applicability of the doctrine of claim preclusion
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
This action concerns the accounting practices of plaintiff, Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (“Sikorsky”), a government contractor, and is a reprise of a prior dispute between Sikorsky and the United States (“the government”) over those practices. At this juncture, the question before the court is…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sunoco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Ameriserv Trust & Financial Services Co. Ex Rel. Employee Real Estate Construction Trust Fund v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Sonoma Apartment Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Arensmeyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Digiflight, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.