Legal Opinion
Coursault v. Schwebel
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1931No. Docket No. 7822PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
An appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict of $6,500 in favor of plaintiff and against defendants.
On June 26, 1928, at the intersection of Sacramento and Maple Streets in San Francisco, the plaintiff received personal injuries when he was struck by an automobile owned by defendant Schwebel and operated by defendant Barrett.
As grounds for their appeal defendants claim that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law; that the court erred in admitting in evidence a certain ordinance of the city and county of San Francisco and in its instructions to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Mann v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Lafargue v. United Railroad of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moniz v. BettencourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Nicholas v. LeslieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Coppock v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Barr v. MountjoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Breaux v. SoaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.