Legal Opinion
Nicholas v. Leslie
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 14, 1935No. Civ. 9134PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHINN, J., pro tem.
tem .The defendants appeal from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial in an action for personal injuries in which the verdict of the jury was in favor of the defendants.
Insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict was specified by the court as one of the grounds upon which the motion was granted.
Plaintiff was struck by an automobile of the defendants while she was crossing a street in the city of Santa Barbara. Appellants claim the order granting a new trial upon this ground was erroneous for the reason that no negligence of Victoria Leslie, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Weaver v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Flach v. FikesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Collom v. BlochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Coursault v. SchwebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fischer v. KeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- United States v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Douglas v. HoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. LettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Woods v. EitzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.