Legal Opinion
Moniz v. Bettencourt
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1938No. Civ. 5879; Civ. 5880PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
This appeal is from two judgments based upon verdicts rendered by a jury empaneled to try the two cases which were consolidated for that purpose. Both cases arose out of the same automobile accident.
In the case of Moniz, as administrator of the estate of Edith Moniz, deceased, against the appellants, the administrator sought to recover damages upon behalf of the heirs of Edith Moniz.
In the second case Moniz sued in his own right, and as guardian ad litem for his two minor sons. After a trial by jury a verdict was rendered in the action by Moniz, as administrator, in the sum of $16,555, and in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coursault v. SchwebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Williams v. A. R. G. Bus Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Levy v. BernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by23 opinions
- Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Wells Truckways, Ltd. v. CebrianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Causey v. CorneliusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Aguilera v. Reynolds Well Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Ida M. Kale and Lester E. Kale v. Martin F. Douthitt, and Automatic Sprinkler Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.