Legal Opinion
Barr v. Mountjoy
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1942No. Civ. 12814PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS (J. E.), J. pro tem.
Action for damages resulting from a collision between an automobile driven by defendant Jeannette Mountjoy and plaintiff, a pedestrian. Defendant Holton C. Mountjoy is the husband of Jeannette Mountjoy, and the complaint alleges “that in operating said automobile as aforesaid said Jeannette Mountjoy was acting as the agent of and for and on behalf of the other defendants named herein.” The only defendant served or appearing herein other than the driver is the husband-. The trial was before the court without a jury and resulted in judgment for defendants.
*42Plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Phillips v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Power v. FairbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Nicholas v. LeslieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Petroff v. NunesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Stoneburner v. Richfield Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baker v. BerremanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Annin v. Belridge Oil Employees Federal Credit UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Baker v. BerremanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Barr v. MountjoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- State v. AdamsonUtah Supreme Court · 1942