Legal Opinion

Mann v. Scott

California Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1919No. L. A. No. 4596PublishedCited by 74 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

The facts upon which this appeal is based are stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Finlayson, presiding in the district court of appeal, second appellate district, division two. We adopt that opinion in part as follows:

“While crossing from the sidewalk to where was standing a street-ear that she intended taking, plaintiff was struck by an automobile owned by defendant Scott and driven by his chauffeur, defendant Layman. She brought the action to recover damages for the personal injuries thus occasioned. Verdict and judgment were for plaintiff. From the judgment and order denying their motion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Clark v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Chrissinger v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Sheperd v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API