Hayes v. Cleveland Pneumatic Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Patricia A. Blackmon, Judge.
This appeal requires that we decide whether as a matter of law there exists a genuine issue for trial when an employer discharges an employee after the employer learns that the employee’s chemical dependency is adversely affecting his job performance.
Ronald Hayes, plaintiff-appellant, challenges the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of his employer Cleveland Pneumatic Company (“Pneumatic”), defendant-appellee. Hayes argues that claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, handicap discrimination, fraud, and deprivation of his pension raised…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Russ v. TRW, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Hazlett v. Martin Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lee Brenneman v. Medcentral Health SystemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Mitnaul v. Fairmount Presbyterian ChurchOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Shaver v. Wolske & BlueOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Ekstrom v. Cuyahoga County Community CollegeOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Svarnas v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.