Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Cleveland Pneumatic Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1993No. 63654PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patricia A. Blackmon, Judge.

This appeal requires that we decide whether as a matter of law there exists a genuine issue for trial when an employer discharges an employee after the employer learns that the employee’s chemical dependency is adversely affecting his job performance.

Ronald Hayes, plaintiff-appellant, challenges the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of his employer Cleveland Pneumatic Company (“Pneumatic”), defendant-appellee. Hayes argues that claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, handicap discrimination, fraud, and deprivation of his pension raised…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Russ v. TRW, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hazlett v. Martin Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lee Brenneman v. Medcentral Health SystemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Mitnaul v. Fairmount Presbyterian ChurchOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Shaver v. Wolske & BlueOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Ekstrom v. Cuyahoga County Community CollegeOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Svarnas v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API