Legal Opinion
Russ v. TRW, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1991No. 89-1741PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
I
The initial contention of appellant challenges the jury verdict in favor of *47appellee on the claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress. At the outset, appellant maintains that recovery on this basis is tantamount to recognizing a claim . for wrongful discharge, which was rejected by this court in Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co. (1985), 19 Ohio St. 3d 100, 19 OBR 261, 483 N.E. 2d 150, as applied to the at-will employment context. Appellant has, however, mischaracterized the basis for the claim presently at issue.
As a preliminary matter, it must be observed that this court has…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Cohen v. Lamko, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Wornick Co. v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Williams v. Aetna Finance Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Martha Sabol Wright John C. Wright, Jr. v. Metrohealth Medical Center, Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Williams v. Aetna Fin. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Kassem v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.