Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
Wing appeals the entry of summary judgment against him, arguing that material issues of fact exist concerning his claims against defendants. We disagree. Consequently, we affirm the summary judgment for defendants on all these claims.
I
Initially we note that Wing’s employment with Anchor was, from its inception, terminable at will. In the courts below, Wing asserted that his employment was not terminable at will, but rather was a contract of employment terminable for cause only based upon the terms of the employee handbook.
The trial court and appellate court both held that the disclaimer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by665 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
660 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.