Ekstrom v. Cuyahoga County Community College
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
James J. Sweeney, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Carol Ekstrom (“plaintiff’) appeals from a judgment of the common pleas court that granted defendant-appellee Cuyahoga County Community College’s (“CCC”) motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims. Upon review, we conclude that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that CCC is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on plaintiffs claims. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
{¶ 2} A review of the record reveals the following facts: Plaintiff, a white female, was hired as an administrative assistant at CCC in 1978.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Dennis E. Gaul v. Lucent Technologies Inc. John Does 1-100 Jane Does 1-100 Abc Corp. Xyz CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Mendlovic v. Life Line Screening of America, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Sabitov v. GrainesOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Grooms v. Supporting Council of Preventative EffortOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Frankmann v. Skyline Management, 88807 (8-2-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Jade Sterling Steel Co. v. Stacey, Unpublished Decision (2-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.