Legal Opinion

Hazlett v. Martin Chevrolet, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1986No. 85-1426PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

The issue before us is whether drug addiction and alcoholism are handicaps as defined in R.C. 4112.01(A)(13). Pursuant to *280the discussion that follows we find for appellee and hold that drug addiction and alcoholism are handicaps as defined by R.C. 4112.01(A)(13).

R.C. 4112.01(A)(13) states that “ ‘[hjandicap’ means a medically diagnosable, abnormal condition which is expected to continue for a considerable length of time, whether correctable or uncorrectable by good medical practice, which can reasonably be expected to limit the person’s functional ability, including, but not limited to,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. University of Cincinnati v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Davis v. BucherDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Whitaker v. Board of Higher Ed. of City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  5. Consolidated Freightways, Inc. v. Cedar Rapids Civil Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Clowes v. Terminix International, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Philip R. Plant v. Morton International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. City of Columbus Civil Service Commission v. McGloneOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Phillips v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API