Nanny v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
.BELT, C. J.
This is a replevin action to recover possession of 332 cases of whiskey valued at $11,010.13 alleged to be wrongfully detained by the Oregon Liquor Control Coimnission. Tlie cause was submitted to the court, without the intervention of a jury. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant Commission appeals.
There is no- dispute as to the facts. It is conclusively established that plaintiff owned the whiskey in California; that it was stolen from him; and that without his knowledge or consent it was transported into the state of Oregon. The Commission introduced no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. DitmarWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. OpieOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. AschenbrennerOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Krebs Hop Co. v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- PETERS v. McKAYOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. AnnenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Gooch v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Odom v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.