Legal Opinion

Nanny v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1946PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.BELT, C. J.

This is a replevin action to recover possession of 332 cases of whiskey valued at $11,010.13 alleged to be wrongfully detained by the Oregon Liquor Control Coimnission. Tlie cause was submitted to the court, without the intervention of a jury. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant Commission appeals.

There is no- dispute as to the facts. It is conclusively established that plaintiff owned the whiskey in California; that it was stolen from him; and that without his knowledge or consent it was transported into the state of Oregon. The Commission introduced no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DitmarWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State v. OpieOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. State v. AschenbrennerOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Krebs Hop Co. v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. PETERS v. McKAYOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. AnnenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. Gooch v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Odom v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API