Legal Opinion

State v. Opie

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1946PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

The statute provides that

“Every person who takes or uses without authority of the owner or person entitled to possession thereof and not seized under judicial process or not distrained for trespass, any * * bull, cow,

steer, calf or heifer, or who shall be a party to any such unauthorized taking or using, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than two years, or by a fine • ° O. C. L. A. § 32-1802.

The indictment so far as relevant here reads as follows:

“Hazel Opie is accused by the Grand Jury of the County of Harney by this Indictment of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. State v. DiamondNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. AnthonyOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Monnet v. UllmanOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HooverOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. City of Portland v. GoodwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Oregon v. DerryberryOregon Supreme Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API