Legal Opinion

State v. Neel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 4, 1972PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Defendant appeals from convictions for possession of marihuana, ORS 474.020, and dangerous drugs, ORS 475.100, contending, among other things, that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the mental element of these offenses.

Regarding each of the two counts of the indictment, the trial court instructed the jury:

“* * * [I]t is necessary for the State to prove beyond a reasonable doubt * * *:

* * that the defendant knew or had reason to believe that the substance was a * * * [narcotic drug or dangerous drug, respectively] * * (Emphasis supplied.)

Defendant excepted to the emphasized…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. The People v. MacKIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. BoggsWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Duran v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. SternWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. KrohnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. RedemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API