Gooch v. Rogers
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRqssman, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs, owners of a tract of reforestation land, from a declaratory judgment which held that the penalty provision of § 107-125, O.C.L.A., is valid, and that the court had no power to relieve the plaintiffs from a penalty which ivas imposed upon, them in the latter part of 1948 under that section of our laws.
The plaintiffs contend that the circuit court erred (1) “in not declaring the penalty provision of O.C.L.A. 107-125 unconstitutional and void”, and (2) “in failing to waive and remit the penalty.”
Section 107-125, O.C.L.A., was § 10 of Oregon Laws 1929, ch.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. GrosjeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. SeegersSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Broadhead v. MonaghanMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
- State ex rel. Hardy v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Feero v. HousleyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- City of Idanha v. Consumers Power, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Walton v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.