Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Aschenbrenner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1943PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, C. J.

The grand jury of Wallowa county on December 9, 1941, returned an indictment against the defendants, Beuben Aschenbrenner, Chester Aschenbrenner and Jack Houp, accusing them of the crime of “larceny by taking up estrays and not complying with estray laws, committed as follows:

“The said Beuben Aschenbrenner, Chester Aschenbrenner and Jack Houp on the 23rd day of October, A. D. 1941, in the said county of Wallowa and state of Oregon, then and there being, and then and there acting jointly and together, and having theretofore and more than 5 days prior thereto taken up as estrays, the following…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Kasle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  2. Peterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  3. State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  4. Commonwealth v. FinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BurrowOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Edvalson v. SwickOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. NavarroAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1979
  4. State v. RedemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. State v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API