State v. Ditmar
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
Josephine Ditmar and Frank Dit-mar were found guilty by tbe verdict of a jury of tbe offense of manufacturing intoxicating liqnor for tbe purpose of sale, barter and exchange, and appeal from tbe judgment pronounced upon tbe verdict.
To an understanding of tbe errors assigned for a reversal of tbe judgment, an outline of tbe salient facts is necessary. On tbe evening of September 13, 1923, two young men stopped at tbe garage of one William Colville, at Reardan, Lincoln county, Washington, and inquired of Colville as to tbe location of a certain farm in that vicinity. Tbe young men either did…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Ker v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- State v. HughlettWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. MelvernWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. DersiyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. DeitzWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. MickensWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- City of Mercer Island v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1930
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.