Legal Opinion

State v. Annen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 12, 1973PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

This appeal presents the question of whether it was error to admit into evidence in a negligent homicide trial the results of a blood alcohol test showing an alcohol content of .24 per cent① when the blood sample which was tested was taken from the defendant after the defendant had expressly refused the state permission to take a blood sample from him. Under the terms of the Implied Consent Law, ORS 483.634 et seq, as interpreted by State v. Fogle, 254 Or 268, 459 P2d 873 (1969), the results of the test should not have been received in evidence.

*205The night of September 14, 1971, defendant was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. CramOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State v. FogleOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Heer v. Department of Motor VehiclesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Thorp v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. HitchensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. State v. HeintzOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. ScharfOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. StoverOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. BuckinghamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API