Legal Opinion

Mattei v. Hopper

California Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1958No. S. F. 19806PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for damages after defendant allegedly breached a contract by failing to convey her real property in accordance with the terms of a deposit receipt which the parties had executed. After a trial without a jury, the court concluded that the agreement was “illusory” and lacking in “mutuality.” From the judgment accordingly entered in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff was a real estate developer. He was planning to construct a shopping center on a tract adjacent to defendant’s land. For several months, a real estate agent attempted to negotiate a sale of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Collins v. Vickter Manor, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
  4. Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Rafael Chodos, an Individual v. West Publishing Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Doing Business in California Dba Bancroft-Whitney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Meyer v. BenkoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Locke v. Warner Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Storek & Storek, Inc. v. Citicorp Real Estate, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API