Wristen v. Bowles
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
This is an action for the recovery of the sum of ten thousand dollars damages for the alleged breach of a contract for the sale of land. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and the defendant had judgment. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was denied, and plaintiff appealed.
There are no findings in the record, nor does it affirmatively appear that findings were waived, but as no point is made on the want of findings, we pass to a consideration of the case on its merits, assuming that the facts found support the judgment.
Appellant makes two points, the first of which is not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Manufacturing Co. v. TrainerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Tilley v. County of CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Luckhart v. OgdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ellis v. KlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Phillippe v. Shapell Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1987
- Niles v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Landberg v. LandbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Marsh v. LottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.