Tiffany v. Pacific Sewer Pipe Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff sued for damages caused fry an alleged wrongful discharge of plaintiff from the defendant’s service. The court below made findings and entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $3,617.17, being the full amount prayed for in the complaint. Defendant appeals.
The defendant was engaged in the business of manufacturing glazed brick. Plaintiff was employed by the defendant as an “expert glazeman” for the term of three years beginning February 10, 1914, under a contract in writing made on February 12, 1914, and modified on May 12, 1914. The first contract provided that Tiffany should…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Church v. ShanklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Parkside Realty Co. v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Allen v. PockwitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Coplew v. DurandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Gladding, McBean & Co. v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Collins v. Vickter Manor, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Storek & Storek, Inc. v. Citicorp Real Estate, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.