Legal Opinion

Dix v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1991No. S012342PublishedCited by 278 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

—Alan Dale Bradley was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to prison. Thereafter, the superior court invoked Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d) (hereafter section 1170(d)),1 to recall Bradley’s sentence. Petitioner William Edward Dix, the victim of Bradley’s assault, sought mandate or prohibition to overturn the recall order and prevent substitution of a new sentence. Petitioner argued that section 1170(d) permits recall and resentencing only under limited circumstances not present in Bradley’s case.

The Court of Appeal issued a peremptory writ of mandate. It…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. HaskettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. KeenanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by278 opinions

  1. People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

273 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API