Legal Opinion

United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 5, 1922No. 31PublishedCited by 469 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

There are five principal questions pressed by the pláintiffs in error here, the defendants below. The first is that there was a misjoinder of parties plaintiff. The second is that the United Mine Workers of America, District No. 21, United Mine Workers of America, and the local unions made defendants, are unincorporated associations and not. subject to suit and therefore should have been dismissed from the case on motions seasonably made. The third is that thére is no evidence to show any agency by the United Mine Workers of America, in the conspiracy charged or in the actual destruction of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by469 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

464 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API