Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 19, 2005No. AC 25156PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The petitioner, Lee Vme Kelley,1 appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that his trial counsel failed to provide effective assistance of counsel, as guaranteed by the sixth and fourteenth amendments to the United States constitution and article first, § 8, of the constitution of Connecticut, by (1) not conducting an adequate pretrial investigation and (2) failing to act in a variety of ways during the trial. The petitioner also claims that he is actually innocent and that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. State v. KelleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Toccaline v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Henry v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lorthe v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. Floyd v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Alexander v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Andrades v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API