Legal Opinion

Henry v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 10, 2000No. AC 18095PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPEAR, J.

The petitioner, Luz Henry, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing her petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which she alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. She claims that the dismissal was improper because trial counsel failed (1) to investigate the petitioner’s mental history, (2) to obtain an expert to review the petitioner’s mental health records and (3) to interview codefendants who would have provided exculpatory statements. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

*315The following facts were found by the habeas court and are relevant to this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Holley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. State v. SilvaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Baillargeon v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Milner v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. State v. WebbConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API