Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 12, 2006No. AC 26622PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Robert Smith, appeals after the trial court denied his petition for certification to appeal from the court’s judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Although the amended petition alleged ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel, the petitioner on appeal argues that at trial there was an unconstitutional variance between the crimes charged and the crimes for which he was convicted. Because the petitioner did not raise the issue of variance either at trial on direct appeal or at the habeas hearing, and because we conclude that the habeas…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Walker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. Santiago v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Kelley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Oliphant v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. Ankerman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Davis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. Pires v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  5. Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API