Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 4, 2007No. AC 26985PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The petitioner, Carl Alexander, appeals following the denial of certification to appeal from the judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court abused its discretion in denying certification to appeal and improperly rejected his claims that his trial counsel had provided ineffective assistance by (1) failing to advise him properly that, in changing his plea, he would not be sentenced pursuant to a plea agreement but at the court’s discretion and (2) refusing to file a motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. State v. SilvaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ankerman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. Ruffin v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Dawson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Burgos-Torres v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API