Legal Opinion

Paalan v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 4, 2002No. 01-448CPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, whose term of service in the United States Department of the Navy (the “Navy”) was extended involuntarily when he was court-martialed, seeks back pay pursuant to 37 U.S.C. § 204(a) (1994), 10 U.S.C. § 6330(a)-(c) (2000), and 5 U.S.C. § 8301(a) (2000), and compensation for a Fifth Amendment taking of his personal property. Among the issues to be decided are whether plaintiff retired from active duty service; whether the doctrine of issue preclusion — in…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  2. Paalan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. Seay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Paalan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API