Legal Opinion
Seay v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 17, 2004No. 02-582CPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court is the United States’ (the “government’s”) August 26, 2003 motion to dismiss the plaintiffs amended complaint. The plaintiff seeks damages for property that he contends was improperly held by the government and damaged or destroyed during a criminal investigation. The plaintiff claims that the government’s actions resulted in either a “taking” without compensation in contravention of the Fifth Amendment or an “illegal exaction.” The government moves for dismissal under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Acadia Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- AmeriSource Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Arbelaez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Kam-Almaz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Spencer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.