Legal Opinion
Paalan v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 20, 2003No. 01-448C, 02-405CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This ease is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in case No. 02-405C, and on plaintiff’s motion for discovery pursuant to RCFC 56(f) in case No. 01-448C.
FACTS
The facts in this case are recounted in Paalan v. United States, 51 Fed.Cl. 738 (2002) (“Paalan I”), and are incorporated herein by reference. Following this court’s decision in Paalan I, plaintiff, on April 25, 2002, filed a second complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims, case No. 02-*16405C (the “second complaint”), which was consolidated with case No. 01-448C on July 3, 2002.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Greene v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Rq Squared, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Paalan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Dethlefs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Carter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.