Legal Opinion
Paalan v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 30, 2003No. 01-448CPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRADEN, Judge.
Plaintiff summarized the gist of his August 1, 2001 complaint as follows: “Simply put, I was robbed over seven (7) years ago and I seek only the money I am entitled to and no more.” June 9, 2003, Plaintiffs Response at 46. This action concerns a claim for certain military back pay and a compensation claim for the seizure of certain personal property under the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs military pay claim is now barred because of a failure to exhaust administrative remedies and the statute of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Keeton Corrections, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Shirlington Limousine & Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Prati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- South Grand View Development Company, Inc. v. City of Alabaster, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Englewood Terrace Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.