Legal Opinion
Schlagenhauf v. Holder
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 18, 1965No. 8PublishedCited by 1,174 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldberg
This case involves the validity and construction of Rule 35 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as applied to the examination of a defendant in a negligence action. Rule 35 (a) provides:
“Physical and Mental Examination of Persons, (a) Order for examination. In an action in which the mental or physical condition of a party is in controversy, the court in which the action is pending may order him to submit to a physical or mental examination by a physician. The order may be made only on motion for good cause shown and upon notice to the party to be examined and to all other parties and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,174 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
1,169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.