Legal Opinion
Shirsat v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 16, 1996No. Civil Action No. 93-3202PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUTTON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Defendant’s Motion to Compel an Independent Psychiatric Examination of Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules .of Civil Procedure, and Plaintiffs opposition thereto.
I. BACKGROUND
In this action, the plaintiff, Nagesh Shirsat (“Shirsat”), seeks to obtain damages for psychiatric harm resulting from the alleged wrongful termination of his employment with the defendant, Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. (“Mutual”), on April 30, 1992. Both parties concede that a psychiatric condition is “in controversy.” The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Tomlin v. HolecekDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- James J. Acosta, Sr. v. Tenneco Oil Company and Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Lowe v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Duncan v. Upjohn Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Hertenstein v. Kimberly Home Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Billy Overstreet v. TRW Commercial Steering DivisionTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Ornelas v. Southern Tire Mart, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. OverstreetKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Favale v. Roman Catholic Diocese of BridgeportDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.