Legal Opinion
Mikolinski v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 9, 1999No. AC 17835PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, C. J.
The plaintiff, Christie Mikolinski, appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing her appeal from the decision of the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner). The court sustained the commissioner’s suspension of the plaintiffs license to operate a motor vehicle on the ground that she had operated her vehicle while her blood alcohol content was in excess of the limit prescribed in General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 14-227b (f), now § 14-227b (g).1 The plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) the initial stop of her vehicle was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Buckley v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Volck v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Barasso v. Rear Still Hill Road, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Stechel v. FosterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Roy v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Summerbrook West, L.C. v. FostonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. NesteriakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.