Legal Opinion
Volck v. Muzio
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 28, 1987No. 13045PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The plaintiff, Raymond A. Volck, appealed to the Superior Court from the suspension of his motor vehicle operator’s license by the defendant commissioner pursuant to our implied consent statute, General Statutes § 14-227b.1 The suspension followed the *509plaintiff’s refusal to submit to a blood, breath or urine test for the purpose of determining whether he had been operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs. The court dismissed his appeal despite its finding that the provisions of the statute pertaining to the refusal to submit to such a test had not been…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sears v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Buckley v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Wilcox v. BillingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Schutt v. MacduffNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. DeCosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Schallenkamp v. DelPonteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Fishbein v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. GuckianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.