Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Muzio

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 27, 1986No. 12683PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDannehy, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court sustaining the appeal of the plaintiff whose driver’s license was suspended because she refused to submit to a chemical analysis of her blood, breath or urine.

The plaintiff, Mae T. Buckley, was arrested for operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor. After arresting the plaintiff, the police officer requested the plaintiff to submit to a blood, breath or urine test and informed her that her motor vehicle operator’s license would be suspended if she refused. The plaintiff refused to submit to any test and a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Persico v. MaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. City of New Haven v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Starr v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Board of Education v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Dolgner v. AlanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Volck v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API