Legal Opinion
Summerbrook West, L.C. v. Foston
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 11, 2000No. AC 18326PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The substitute plaintiff, Summerbrook West, L.C. (Summerbrook), appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying Summerbrook’s motion for permission to bring an action against the court-appointed receiver of the real property that is the subject of this foreclosure action. Summerbrook claims that the court improperly found that it failed to establish a prima facie case that the receiver exceeded its authority. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The pertinent facts are as follows. In August, 1993, CTB Realty Services, Inc. (CTB Realty), the original plaintiff, brought a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Links v. Connecticut River Banking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Strobel v. StrobelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. LewisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- 1525 Highland Associates, LLC v. FohlConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Carrubba v. MoskowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Ceslik v. WinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.