Legal Opinion
State v. Rios
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 30, 1993No. 10573; 10574PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCretella, J.
The defendants, Daniel and Gilberto Rios, who are brothers, appeal from convictions arising out of the possession and sale of narcotics in contravention of General Statutes §§ 21a-278 (b), 21a-279 (a), 53a-48 and 53a-167. The defendants filed motions to suppress that were denied after a hearing by the trial court, Freed, J. Subsequently, the defendants entered pleas of nolo contendere, reserving the right pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94a to appeal from the denial of their motions to suppress. On a finding of guilty, the trial court, Damiani, J., sentenced each defendant.
The defendants…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. ReaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. HoeplingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. MacNeilConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
3Cited by52 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Holmes v. HolmesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- In re Eden F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Fiddelman v. RedmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.