Legal Opinion

Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 14, 1990No. 88-1897PublishedCited by 1,187 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

This case poses the question whether a State’s use of highway sobriety checkpoints violates the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. We hold that it does not and therefore reverse the contrary holding of the Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Petitioners, the Michigan Department of State Police and its director, established a sobriety checkpoint pilot program in early 1986. The director appointed a Sobriety Checkpoint Advisory Committee comprising representatives of the State Police force, local police forces, state prosecutors, and the University of Michigan…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Brower Ex Rel. Estate of Caldwell v. County of InyoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,187 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. al-KiddSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. United States v. Nicholas Omar MidgetteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  3. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

1,182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API