Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Haywood County v. Welch

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Defendants contend that their answers set up a plea in bar which should have been disposed of before a compulsory reference was ordered. But upon consideration of the pleadings, we are of opinion that the order of reference was properly entered, and that defendants’ answer does not preclude the court from making such order at this time. Manifestly, the case, which involves more than five hundred items, must be tried by referee, unless the facts pleaded in the answer be such as to defeat plaintiff’s action absolutely and entirely in the outset before the necessity for an accounting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. . BeamanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Murchison National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Commissioners of Iredell County v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Reynolds v. . MortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Jones v. Sugg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Industrial Lithographic Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Preister v. Stanly Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Perry v. DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Leach v. QuinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API