Legal Opinion

Jones v. . Beaman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1895PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Civil aotioN, heard, on exceptions to report of a referee, before Graham, J., at Fall Term, 1895, of GtbeeNe Superior Court. His Honor overruled the exceptions and affirmed the judgment of the referee for the defendant, and plaintiff appealed. The facts appear in the opinion of Ass' ciate Justice Aveky.

1Opinion of the Court

Faircloth, C. J.:

In 1879, O. W. Jones died an I his widow became his administratrix, who resigned in 1880, and R. C. D. Beaman, intestate of defendant, became administrator d. b. n., and he died, and the plaintiff became administrator d. b. u. on said estate. R. O. D. Beaman made no final settlement, but made a return to the clerk showing a sum in his hands due the estate at his death, for which the plaintiff brought suit and recovered $500, the amount found by the jury, the plaintiff not knowing that a greater sum was then due. Afterwards the plaintiff brought suit against the defendant,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yates v. . YatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Van Buren Bryan v. MalloySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Temple v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. McNeill v. . LawtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. White v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Piedmont Wagon Co. v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Murchison National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Royster v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Vineseck v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. DeLoache v. DeLoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API