Murchison National Bank v. Evans
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
The defendants base their appeal upon the sole proposition that the answer filed by them constitutes a plea in bar, and therefore the trial judge had no authority to order a compulsory reference under C. S., 573, subsec. 1, until tbe merits of tbe plea in bar bad first been determined. Tbe rule of law invoked by tbe defendants, is declared as follows in Duckworth v. Duckworth, 144 N. C., 620: “It bas been established witb us tbat no order of reference to take and state an account should be made when there is a plea in bar of account which goes to tbe entire demand until said plea bas been…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jones v. . BeamanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Oldham v. . RiegerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Bank of Tarboro v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Jones v. Wooten.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Wilson v. Knox CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- TROY LUMBER COMPANY v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Cowart v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Scott Poultry Company v. Bryan Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Harrell v. HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.